Loading...
1991-25 Variance Lot 252 Pine Tree EstatesRESOLUTION NO. 91-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PARKLAND, FLORIDA FOR A VARIANCE OF LOT 252, PINE TREE ESTATES, ROBERT ZIELKE, CASE NO. 001-V-91. 91354158 WHEREAS, at a regular meeting of the City Commission, on the 3rd day of July, 1991, a Public Hearing was held to hear testimony and receive Exhibits for and against the Petition of Robert Zielke, requesting a variance to Section 22-54 of the City of Parkland, Code of Ordinance. FROM: 75' front yard setback TO: 50' front yard setback VARIANCE: 25' feet front yard setback on property located and described as follows: LOT 252, 6689 NW 67 PLACE, PARKLAND, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, a proper Notice of Public Hearing was sent to property owners of record within 500 feet of the subject property. WHEREAS, after due consideration of all testimony and Exhibits and review of the criteria for granting a variance as set forth in the Code of Ordinance governing the City Commission , the Commission found that all necessary criteria had been satisfied, and; NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Commission of the City of Parkland, Florida that; The variance request of Robert Zielke, Case No. 001-V-91 has satisfied criteria set forth in the Code of Ordinance. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 3.1XAY OF JULY FFE ITEM R�TURS� T4 d RE C4RD1N F ROOT E SUSAN ARMSTRONG, CITY CI, RK , 1991. SA 'PAGLI ` YOR City of Parkland 6500 Parkside Drive Parkland, Florida 33067 m %Ao °gra o CO' CO fpmnae AM:avid 1J `I � LR. S. non Rod Set I. R.F. Iron Rod Found I.P. F. Iron Pip. Found RCP Panmaant Cashel PSM[ U.E. Utility Eaa•meat 0.E. Ordngs Ee*. m4 Rni Ore.RadM leerhy N.R. Non Rodlof 4. Canter Line A D.Hs(CatlhslAnglo) R Radius Ler• Lomita dCamel/we) E.rM. Eesarnent ' CL.F Crain Link Fence Co11c Concrete -NW Pa 329.92' w' /".a PO. N.W 67th MAC DENNIS R. POORE, Inc. 1-89.04104 2'f RDAo mo ur{L17Y EASEMENT L•s.z 5, oz 10.4"`r on 0?<M 90•55r554 . :tea e w' LRS. , OM .L r" P/ O.. r5 CO Ott On s• O» •4 OM OM en •1. «M1 00 en est et ee 01 aM Ott 014 97 05 04 04 ea 0.7cw • OM OT a i on en 02132 010.415 01..4.r1,C 1M140. TF.S .1510100[51 .1007 "111001510 •tYL(CT ALL 5.1,401 •[.'AWNS TO t.,t•t.11. N.ttItt57I. 01007 Or •.75. 1sT O.C. LINCS. YATg51. Oa ..t 11014. Maili., *0140 1000L0 44 OStAl000 A55 co..mots 0540r,tO verse rt.IPICATI0e e11 0 O N 0. eu� 19 •1a YOJ) a! eel 3eo g&•1 ut C- 077 e' 329.92 u,., usi rose 885.7.29" '� 0.3' ,orator f film .•.R7 S-5-11 41145 ; • L w."".tt0 _ 55.t J SIZE TYPE 1. 5 inch Pine S1. 12 inch Pine 2. 7 52. 12 " 3. 5" « 53 .9 " 4. 5 . .. 54.6 " 6. 14" « 55.7 " « 7.56..20" 5 " " S7. " 8. 5 " T1 « 9. S « 58. 14" . 10. 8." 59.9 w « 11. 1S" " 60. 7 12. 14" Cab. Pale 61.9 " 13.63« Pine 63. 8 . 14. S " Pine 63. 61. S 51 . 15. 7 " 16. 4/6" Db1.Pine 65. 12 " 66. 10 " 17. 6 " Pine 18. 4 " « 6T. 17 " 4019. 10" Cab.Palm 68. 10 " 20. 5 " Pine 69.6 " 21. 12" 70. 12 " « 22. 5 " « 71. 14 " 23. 8 " « 72.8 73. IS " 24. 4 " Pine 74. 11 " 25. 5 " 75. 8 " 26. 14" " 76. 16 27. 7 " 77. 17 " 2s. -78. 10 " - 29. 6 " 79. 9 " 30. 12" 80.7 " 31. 7 " Pine 32. 12" 33. 8 " 34. 10" " 35. 4 " 36. 6 37 5 " 3a. 5 » 39. 10" 40. 6 " Wax Myrtle 41. 4 " 42. 10" Cabbage Palm 41. 12" Cabbage Palm 44. 6 " Dahoon RO11y 45. 14" Pine 46. 12" 47. 11" 48. 14" 49. 15" " S0. 12" SIZE TYPE Northwest quarter (1/4) of the South- west quarter (1/4) of the Southeast quarter (1/4) of the Northwest quarter (1/4) of Section 1 Township 48 South Township 41 East. Also known as 252 Pinetree Estates. CERTIFICATION: 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE SKETCH CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MAGE UNOER MY DIREC- TION AND THAT SMO SURVEY MEETS THE'MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS FOR I.ANO SURVEYING IN THE STATE OF FLORWK ;RULE 2OS. EFFECTIVE (9.148[; `` RE41_5. M02225/4559 EMR058E0 SEAL REOUIREO DATE 5.4.91 F5 412 Pa 23 dr. 808946 t LBS 111 rn O OD ID 244 N •—• L -- CO C C CO W l..r■1.1"•... • imam ••Em••ism ■ ha. ■•131•me - ` I • iID W co t 243 rn N 10 0 % 0 242 o tn 249 249 253 0 CO tor - 111 C C 1"— t.0 0 NW 67 PLACE CO • •441..._ • C CO 0 0 40.• ti ti A N.A • 00 264to O N 10 ti • N,- 252 w 265 `° U cn tow 250 co i B 2671 f 1 y _ *44 •�,.•'. o t C i C 1 0 ID ID o h, LC1 '••251 •f 266 E ?jilt /cr CITY OF PARKLAND ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION petition for Variances and interpretations of questions ;elated to the Zoning Code. REQUIRED INFORMATION A. FEE $ 500.00 * B. (2) SEALED SURVEYS C. (10) FOLDED SITE PLANS D. Date 3-L3-9/ Case No. 061-v-11 Receipt No. 12 3 7 NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FT. 1. The undersigned hereby petitions the City of Parkland for a a) Variance from Section(s) of the Code of Ordiances b) Appeal from the decision of an administrative official concerning $ection(sl of the Zoning Code. The petitioner requests that the necessary reviews/hearings by the City to be held to consider the granting of this petition. 2. The property is presently zoned /9 E-2 and is located as follows: a) Address b) Lot(s) :Z5.2 Block Subdivision P/6/ErkEE EST, c) Folio No.: 3. I am the (check one): ( ) Owner ( ) Lessee Other (spfecify) ( ) Trustee (i4 Contract Purchaser 4. The record owner of the property is: Nailing address: 5. Check applicable box belows SETBACK FRONT YARD SIDE YARD REAR YARD OTHER, SPECIFY ... CODE SECTION CODE REQUIREMENT PETITIONERS REQUEST VARIANCE AMOUNT 6. The applicant must answer all of the following: (attach a separate sheet if necessary.) (a) (b) Are the special and unique conditions directly attributable to petitioner's case and not generally applicable to the property in the z ning district? .T.�rn c 4A cr-� - �7u.r_ Are the special and unique conditions directly attributable to actions of the petitionggr?%,)rho or whlyt is responsible? No-, idA. .A.441. LOW- mss' ..e, 7`iv ioX.e4-:lo-,.d1:.. ...AK.uct,.,G,C/aid • ALs+0 the located the (c) How would the literal interpretation of the Code of Ordinance, as applied to the petitioner, deprive the petitioner of rights commonly enjoyed by the owners of other propert in the zoningdistrict? ✓ �.�.�.,. (d) Is the variance granted the minimum variance necessary for the petitioner to make reasonable use of the property? L�� Would granting the variance be detriment l to the public welfare, or injurious to property or improvements in the zoning,f��i�strict or neighborhood ).nvolved? How or how not? /Vs .z .[!eTi�u _ w.,s. (e) (1) Biased; Petitioner Would granting the variance be contrary to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Parkland (Staff assistance required) Pet tioner Name, Address, & Phone ObE$T ' zee /53o 5.47. /2 DFEd'F/EcD 43c/1. / FG 33V41/ �Db� (Please Print or Type) i B:APPFORM\BA • Allet Sianeds J� /Owner of Record or Authorised Agent ' (Attach Authorisation) Receive DATE a2/9�